Fear Response

On the internet, there is no end to conspiracy theories on any topic imaginable and there is no serious or concerted attempt made to censor them. There are debates that can get rancorous and occasionally someone like Alex Jones will go too far in over sensationalizing a conspiracy theory such that it may become slanderous or actionable in civil court. But otherwise outlandish or even absurd conspiracy theorists go about their business unimpeded. Nobody cares about them aside from true believers and spergy skeptics. In this one can easily discern the conspiracy theories that have no basis in reality versus the ones that make the ruling class nervous and rail against them.

On a quick side note, I'm distinguishing here between conspiracy theories and attempts to de-platform and silence or censor those who espouse any politically critical viewpoint to even a hair to the right of Trotsky which annoys or contradicts the diktats of the Ruling Class. Of concern here is the latter.

So when governments and social media platforms actively and openly censor what they are pleased to call "conspiracy theories", it must be asked why and what are they afraid of if that which is being censored are lies or nonsense. Just as why are they so terrified of the general public seeing or reading "harmful information" that justifies draconian censoring. Does harmful information make PC's, laptops or smartphones explode in the users face or cause other physical or psychological injuries? Are our betters desperate to protect us from reading the 21st century high-tech King in Yellow which would make us all hopelessly mad? 

Then this is the case of virologists, epidemiologists, doctors and nurses who questioned the mandatory COVID-19 national lockdowns along with the mandatory wearing of facemasks, latex gloves and standing 6 feet/2 meters apart social distancing restrictions. Even quoting the CDC can get one censored for misinformation to the point where the CDC is refusing to release certain information as they make the asinine claim that information can be somehow "misused".

There are three levels of this censorship and silencing- 

There are the rank and file progressive liberals, woke and social justice warriors whose puritan sensitivity to questioning the religious doctrines of their cargo cult threatens their faith and presumably hurts their chances of getting into progressive heaven, whatever that is. So much so that they view it as tantamount to physical violence that must be met with at least casting the blasphemer into the void if not physically attacking the satanic miscreant. Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live. Remember this, friends who live in red states or red areas, no matter how safe you think you are or how often you retreat to a new Galt's Gulch, the left is still coming for you too. And they will never stop coming for you no matter where you run to.

Then there is the managerial government's need to control all things including the thoughts and actions of their serfs. That the proles and serfs realize that they're being lied to while being forced to say the lie is true is all part of breaking them by humiliating them. In Germany, one can be arrested for questioning the official government dogma of climate change (whatever that happens to mean this week). Arrest and a show trial or a government official Karen to publicly shame dissidents are useful tools to frighten the masses into obedience. In this, the Ruling Class, the managerial bureaucrats and politicians, their non-profit foundation and think-tank advisors have no ideological bent or dogma. This is purely the mechanics of power where ideology is nothing more than a blueprint or schematic and is chosen as strictly functional.

So last but not least in censorship and silencing, in fact the most egregious of all, we have the corporate vassals. Many give a pass to the government on this and focus all their ire on the big, bad, corporations but they may realize that in this censorship, they lose customers/clients and in doing so, lose money but they have a way out of get woke, go broke. This is to any sensible person as counterproductive to any business as it would be to boo the bad guy puppets at a puppet show but it doesn't matter in the economy of the new world order. It serves the government well as a diversion away from the fact that they are in fact pulling the strings. Then it also gives the government the plausible deniability of "it's a private business, they can do what they want and we can't tell them what to do" the government quietly does end runs around the constitution. Unless of course, the issue is a bakery refusing to bake a cake for a same sex wedding and "muh private business" goes right out the window because...reasons.

But don't worry. The cooperative folks at Big Tech, other big corps and banks get their nice government contracts or bailouts, quantitative easing thanks to corporate devotion to BlackRock's ESG scores and endless regulations to keep upstart competition out of the market. The released Twitter files and Mark Zuckerberg's own words shows just how closely the government supervised what may or may not be said on those platform and it's a safe bet that other social media platforms are doing the same. In this environment, businesses that want to survive and flourish find that not only was Phaemon's Dog right, but he eats well too. However, this merger of managerial capitalism and managerial government was only a matter of time as both are based on the same paradigm with similar goals and realized cooperation was more effective and profitable for both. 

For comparison, the People's Republic of China, big businesses make payouts to CCP officials, crawl on their hands and knees as slavish cheerleaders for the CCP to get a piece of the action there but for the most part, have CCP members as owners, partners or as officers of the company. How many mainstream media companies have former politicians and government officials on their payroll and former appointed or tenured bureaucrats working in various corporations and the financial industry. This model our managerial bureaucrats are imposing on the US is not because they believe in Mao or Xi thought or communism in general, but because it increases their power and makes it both hidden under a thin corporate veil and unassailable. They can play the old good cop/bad cop routine until they feel safe enough to wield plenary power out in the open.

So these corporate and bankster worms deserve some derision and catcalls but they are only the henchmen at worst or at best, simply trying to survive in the managerial jungle. Always stay focused on the big picture of who has the monopoly on force and violence and look for who really is pulling the strings. Then think carefully about not only who to vote for for president, but the great guy politician you are planning to re-elect to the congress or the senate.


Donald Cavaioli


P.S.: It would seem contradictory to write here about censorship and not being censored but there is a reason for this. Written blogs, especially wall of text type blogs, mostly aren't considered the "in thing" anymore as the real influencers and big name e-celebs are on YouTube, Tiktok, Twitter or X if you will, among other popular platforms. Then there is the definition of who is an influencer which would be those with a large following, large number of likes to dislikes ratio and with a sizeable interaction in the comments section. These are the ones that attract attention and can face being demonetized, accounts deleted or facing de-platforming in other areas. So this blog fits none of these description with no followers, few readers and no comments and as such can fly below the radar even when pushing the edge of the envelope with the TOS. I would not be surprised to learn that most of those who read this blog are law enforcement, NGO's like the SPLC or ADL, or woke inquisitors searching out up and coming heretics to burn at the stake. But even they aren't stupid enough to invoke the Streisand Effect and if they bother to make any mention of this blog at all, it's to whine or grumble about it in their own echo chambers which I don't care about. 

P.P.S.: On a personal note, I don't really write for fame and fortune but rather because I find it cathartic and a way to explore and evaluate my own ideas. I write on any topic, criticize anyone I find deserves criticism no matter of what political stripe and never try to advertise this blog. Not the formula for a successful influencer and e-celeb but I have no interest in that as it would obligate me to write on topics that would be popular with an audience, refrain from criticizing their sacred cows, and write on a daily basis none of which I really want. Furthermore, it can be frustrating finding a topic to write about on a daily basis without being repetitious and boring to me or taking the time from other things I'd rather be doing to write. I can write or not when I feel like it or have the time for it. It's best this way as nobody wastes their time persecuting some nobody internet rando with the gall and audacity to sign his own name to posts and is effectively talking into the void. Otherwise, they'd make the rando a somebody whose heretical ideas may find an audience. Or perhaps, it's a way to allow what I say to quietly seep out into the wider world. Maybe the quiet ones can be the most dangerous after all.

Humans Monetized and As Dematerialized Property

 When the WEF or other foundations and NGO's promote trans-humanism, it is almost a 100% certainty that the only benefit will be to those referred to as the stakeholders. To define stakeholders, it would be easier to say who they are not: The average person that the likes of Yuval Harari would refer to as "useless people". Then the benefits to the stakeholders may be as follows.

The recent debates on whether children or young adults can determine their own sex or gender and have unlimited access to drugs and surgery to approximate their perceived gender. This gnostic concept of gender, as it's defined by adherents of trans-sexualism and their allies in government, NGO's, the medical, pharmaceutical and psychiatric industries has brought into being the concept of the human body as property. One is no longer the owner of their own body and life with inalienable rights but a property that can be leased back to the individual. This is property that can be monetized, leased or rented but never owned by an individual but only owned by private entities like a corporation or a bank. 

Bear in mind, as the monopoly on force and violence is the definition of power and wielded solely by government. Any power, or more properly, franchised privilege, granted to any private entities is granted only by government and directly used by government to their benefit. Banks and corporations are therefore only the cat's paw of government. It's important to understand exactly who is really pushing these agendas discerning the puppet from the puppeteer.

In the recent rental and leasing business model which is becoming more common where to paraphrase Klaus Schwab* that people don't really want to own property but only to have the benefits of it and so they're content to merely rent it. The trans movement brings this concept to simply enjoying the benefits of the modified human form itself without really owning it. Wherein what our managerial government overlords were pleased to call the covid pandemic crises, granted themselves the power to compel its citizens to be injected with an experimental drug, among other restrictions, and thus denied individual human beings the control over their own bodies which made them de-facto property of the state. Then the concept of gender, as opposed to biological sex, made surgical modifications to the human body a rental property of the biomedical industry because it entails permanent drugs and medical supplies needed to maintain the surgical changes, all with the government's blessings. Whenever property is taken from individual ownership and transferred to the collective ownership of government, banks or corporations, such property, as Samuel Francis put it, is dematerialized. Similar to digital currencies and cryptocurrencies no longer being physical currency as being dematerialized in a literal and physical sense.

You will own nothing, have no privacy and be happy may include one's own body if they wish to transcend their own mundane human form through sex change surgery or other trans-humanist modifications. All of these procedures cost money as well as the ongoing corrective or palliative surgeries, pre or post-operative costs of any drugs, medical devices, follow-up exams or psychological counseling that will be incurred over the rest of the surgically modified human's life. In other words, the surgically modified trans-human in a sense now rents their modified body with a maintenance contract from the various medical industries involved and are now, in a sense, the property of said industries.  The free human being as the owner of their own body and life is dematerialized under permanent medical supervision.

Donald Cavaioli

* I attributed the paraphrased quote to Klaus Schwab based on memory and have been unable to track down the original quote regarding business moving to a renting and leasing model and whether it was said by Schwab or some other individual. No surprise there if it was either scrubbed from the internet or buried several pages down on most search engines if it is displayed at all. The World Economic Forum had produced the infamous "Welcome to 2030" video and later, when it became too well known outside globalist corporate and government circles and criticized, denied everything said in the video calling it instead, a conspiracy theory. As well as Schwab's well publicized book and quotes about using the covid crisis as a vehicle to implement the WEF Great Reset and 4th Industrial Revolution policies which is still officially stamped as "debunked" by the mainstream media. Then only because the MSM said so without further proof, and derides critics citing the book and quotes as promoting a conspiracy theory-shaming language used to silence and dissuade people from believing what they see or hear. However, if I find the attribution incorrect or proof is shown here that the quote is incorrect, I will remove it immediately.

Further comments on YouTuber MentisWave post: Refuting Biden: "You need an F-15!" sO jUst GiVe uP YeR GUnZ!

To further elaborate on a comment I left in this MentisWave YouTube post:

The reason Biden, Swawell and other liberals make these cringe threats about nukes and F-15's is that they're not scared of the boogaloo boyz, successionists, or the other 2A keyboard Rambos. And this is bad considering what cowards liberals and other leftists tend to be. But after 20 years or more of this "something's gonna, you leftists, it's gonna happen...soon...any day now....any year now..." who can take these threats seriously anymore?

All talk, no action, from the internet super ninja warriors that even the most vapid leftist in the lowest ranks of the progressive/woke peanut gallery realizes just how full of shit these guys are. So stop it already.

There are some real serious hurdles to this revolution, succession or whatever this fantasy may be. First, how will this boogaloo thing get organized and started anyway? How many supporters will be federal agents, informants, or local law enforcement creating a honeypot to arrest some idiots for planning crimes or posting the most outrageous racist nonsense and the most insipid conspiracy theories to discredit the entire right?

Let's say the organizers can weed out infiltrators and informants, then on to the next hurdle. For all the talk about it's only 2%, 5% or 10% of the population ready, willing and able to successfully fight this revolution, don't forget what the other 98%, 95%, or 90% think about this enterprise. More than half of them, including the military and law enforcement, if not participants, must be willing to give some sub-rosa support if not simple agreement with the cause and tacit support. Otherwise, the 10% will find themselves isolated and being ratted out to Federal forces or local law enforcement to be slaughtered with extreme prejudice. So how much support can be expected and how does one measure it?

Then for all the smarmy talk from the internet warriors about how the US lost Vietnam, Afghanistan, whatever, to barefoot peasant tribesmen armed only with AK-47's, remember there were rules of engagement involved as our managerial overlords hate to cause harm to non-whites. White Americans, on the other hand, will be evil white supremacists plotting to resurrect cyber Hitler and say all sorts of mean things to hurt leftists feelings. So not only will there be no rules of engagement but most likely, the atrocities, torture and war crimes that will happen will at least have the Whitehouse, Congress and the Department of Defense turn a blind eye to it. Or at worst, soldiers who commit these crimes will be given medals and lauded in the mainstream media as heroes. There can be no treatment cruel enough or brutal enough when fighting modern supernazis in defense of  "Our Democracy" (tm). So no, tanks don't hold blocks, they blow them to pieces and turn wannabe rebels and their families into fingerpaint while Joe and Jane Normie cheer.

So not only will the great right wing revolution not be televised, but it is unlikely to happen anytime in the near future. So get real, guys, stop sperging about how democracy and the constitution failed and awaiting some messiah to arrive and rescue you. Understand change will only come after years of getting more serious conservative people, not GOPe fakes, with the balls to tell off the left, woketards, etc. and cut all ties with the WEF, UN and WHO agendas into elected positions. Unfortunately it will take as many generations to fix this mess as it took to get into it. But this is the only way out.

Donald Cavaioli

The Magic King Approaches! or How I learned to stop thinking and love the Russian Federation

Not being properly schooled in gnostic mysticism from the scriptures and prophesies of Evola, I can't fully understand mechanics of how the Magic King will ascend to his throne but maybe there are certain signs that will herald the approach of this messiah. 

Unfortunately, I can't read those signs either so I'll just listen to those more learned in these matters and LO!, our aetherial majesty approacheth! Recent events such as the war in Ukraine may have revealed the Magic King, and most of the right and trans-right have anointed him the Latter Day Prester John- Vladimir Putin the implacable foe of badness and puter of wrong things right.

With the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the subsequent support of of the latter by the entire woke establishment, the only acceptable and correct position of the official true right, not to be confused with Conservatism Inc. of the NRO, is to support the Russian Federation. The reasons given for not supporting the current thing are elucidated in grim detail in this previous post. In short, it's all emotional and mostly concern what a rat, corrupt piece of shit and spawn of the devil Volodymyr Zelensky is. 

How does the Magic King manifest? Let's break it down: Zelensky represents in one person the whole of the globohomo cabal, an American Empire puppet, a Nazi and of course, a jooo. Obviously, the Azov Battalion Nazis are so much more open minded these days about Jews being the president of their country and, this ain't your granddad's NSDAP. Or maybe the mid 20th century German Nazis were really some kind of Jewish and American Empire secret conspiracy to take over Europe because the devils are always cunningly evil. Therefore, all the problems in Europe (the UK included as Europe) aren't really from Europeans making bad decisions at the ballot box, but are really the fault of the Americans, you know. There's CIA color revolutions, Vicky Nuland, and Barry Obama's shenanigans, all evil conspiracies against the forces of good, and did I mention Zelensky is a corrupt asshole too. 

All valid reasons for Russia violating the Budapest Memorandum because as we all know, treaties and other international agreements are contingent on the leader of a country involved being a great guy. Then if there's any rumor of CIA involvement in anything bad, then it must be true because America is evil. If America supports Zelensky and Ukraine, then Zelensky and the Ukraine are evil too.

So this segment of the right, like the left, falls into the angels and devils dichotomy. The devil is always lies, is always evil and even if the devil says something that is true or does something that may be objectively good, it is really lies and evil.

Here, in this model of "thought", as the Zelensky devil is a highly ranked prince of hell, this angel opposing him must be equally powerful and thus our Magic King.

But true to leftist emotional form, human beings have no moral agency but only a fixed, immutable nature. Therefore, the angels and devils dichotomy holds true. The devil is always evil and always lies. So even if the devil does something that appears good or somehow tells the truth, it's really an evil action and the truth is summarily dismissed as a lie. Then whoever opposes the devil must be the angel and the angel is all good and never lies. But even if the angel does something appears evil or lies, it's for a good reason and excused. Nor is it a lie if you look at it from the proper perspective and omit certain uncomfortable facts as the devil's lies. 

Here in the Russian invasion of Ukraine, The Magic King Putin, the angel, is always good and never lies and Zelensky, the devil, is always evil and always lies. Trust RTN's pronouncements and ignore the Ukrainians as they're just too stupid to realize that they are really pawns fighting a proxy war on behalf of the American Empire and NATO aggression. America fights to the last Ukrainian, as the vatniks love to say, in America's insane desire to destroy Russia because reasons and stuff. Or rather, the devil is outraged by good and must destroy it because that's just the devil's thing.

Even if examples of this NATO aggression against Russia or even a military buildup in NATO countries could not be seen in mundane reality and only 5 Russian invasions of 3 neighboring countries appear to our lying eyes, we must believe Russia. Even if there were no physical threats, western countries definitely said mean things to Putin and severely hurt the Magic King's feelings and offended God which is not only sacrilege tantamount to physical assault but deserves physical aggression in retaliation. Let it be noted as aggression purely as defense against a threat firmly supported by spectral evidence. So Russia and Putin are the real victims here! Believe this only because Putin said so and the Magic King never lies. 

It's amazing though, how Putin can be at the same time a galaxy brain master strategist with the most fantastic high tech weaponry on Earth winning a war, any day now, to being a victim of the malefactors of the west, fighting 50 countries at the same time and only managing a stalemate. 

Yes, don't think too much about this war or special operation of guys with guns to protect Russia against Nazi ghosts and invisible NATO troops. Just believe Putin is the Magic King and follow the Russians. Know only that the American CIA serpent in the form of Zelensky entered the Russian garden of Maidan and corrupted some Russians into imagining they're some made up thing called Ukrainians. Then the serpent caused them to commit the sin of insurrection against their rightful sovereign, his sacred majesty Putin, who rules by divine right, and commit fratricide against their Russian brothers. Just like Caine and Able. 

If this is too much squaring the circle, (or rather circling of the square, 'cause we're the not-left right.) nonsense to swallow and one anywhere on the right wants to keep the friendship and goodwill of the trans-right, NRX crowd, etc. (because they're the edgy, cool guys?) then the counter-programmed "I'm against the current thing" NPC will see us through.

As an aside, to sum up the politically correct official right position, it's not that the Ukraine was and is a separate country and Ukrainians are fighting for their country against invading Russians in violation of the Budapest Memorandum. But it's the apocalyptic battle of the Magic King's forces of nationalist good against the American Empire's EU globohomo NATO trans-nationalists forces of evil. Or rather a strong-man nationalist dictator that gets all the boys and girls of the not-left right all hot and bothered, taking the empire that is his by divine right. 

Well, certainly not a rhetorical battle between the dysphoric, nationalist left who identify as the right and the Marxian left that those on the unenlightened, heretical, right like myself imagine it to be. But a battle to usher in a NRX wet dream of very small, self-contained, isolationist countries ruled by wise and benevolent absolute monarchs. Magic Kings, princes and hereditary aristocrats wearing super cool uniforms while riding horses and all the fancy pomp and pageantry to the gaping amazement of their properly subservient peasants.

And who says you can't immanentize the eschaton?

Donald Cavaioli

The Magic King

 

What seems to be driving much of the dissident right movement is a belief that democracy has failed, the U.S. constitution has failed. We cannot vote our way out of our current problems as the uniparty puts forward all the candidates and will somehow stop insurgents from running or that we shouldn't even bother to try. Vote harder is used as a mocking sneer against anyone who would try from the passivists wallowing in their own sense of helplessness.

So the best thing to do is nothing, except perhaps form some kind of monastic alternative institutions to await the arrival of a messianic figure, the Great Man. He will then be crowned as an absolute monarch, the Magic King, God's very own hand picked monarch who rules by divine right and will act in his people's best interest because he's that kind of a great guy. Then the Magic King will defeat the leftist globalists and globohomo of the evil American Empire and fix everything for us just the way the neo/reactionary dissidents would like it because the King and all his descendants can do nothing other than care for his people and nation. I mean, he just has to do these things and be a great guy 'cause it's some kind of law of the universe! 

This is the sort of thinking is characteristic of peasants dreaming of ideal, strongman kings, looking uber cool riding horses while wearing spiffy uniforms. Middle class strivers who having never broken into the ranks of the current ruling class, yet still view themselves as undervalued '10's'. The sort of strivers who dream of being proclaimed kings and ruling class aristocrats because they're so awesome even if no one else notices how awesome they are. Or perhaps latent homosexuals or submissive women with a BDSM fetish for being dominated by powerful alpha males. No judgements here, to each his own, you do you, etc. but outrè or kinky fantasies are no basis for a form of government.  

This belief in a benevolent monarch is pure magical thinking, a child-like belief in a Utopia. Magic King supporters believe absolute monarchy was destroyed by the evil forces of the Enlightenment. Some devil came along and seduced the peasants with the rights of man and self-governance causing them to be expelled from the feudal Eden. A similar line of thinking to neo-confederates who believe in a utopian antebellum America in general and the south in particular which became a paradise lost when the serpent, Abraham Lincoln, entered the garden and seduced the innocents into eating the forbidden fruit of abolition. But, the Magic King, like a messiah, will return during the apocalyptic collapse of liberal democracy and lead us back to Utopia. So who says you shouldn't immanentize the eschaton?

The fallacy in this 'absolute monarch is good' reasoning is how will this king's actions be constrained? How will God intercede if the king who rules by divine right does not rule according to God's laws or oppresses the people over which the monarch rules? How do we even know that the King rules by divine right unless God Himself appears and personally announces this to the masses. Must we take the Magic King's word for it because he wouldn't lie about something as serious as divine right? God's appearance and declaration to the people that this king is God's personally chosen monarch has never been recorded in history so all we ever have had was the king's word on this or the headsman, also chosen by divine right it seems, for those who disagreed. 

Usually throughout history, the man who becomes the king does so because he leads a large and powerful enough army to seize power at the point of a sword and declares himself a monarch by divine right because the king and his army said so. And for anyone who questions this divine right, there's a group of very angry looking soldiers at the front door whose swords would like a word with you, unarmed and outnumbered peasant. Men who are ambitious and want power usually don't fall into the real nice guy camp and whatever benevolence they have is used sparingly and tactically to maintain control but only if necessary. But that benevolence towards the peasantry at least, can always be rescinded at the whim of the king and he answers to no one in this. The armed aristocracy of lords with their own armies, if there are any in the realm, is another matter. Power flows from the barrel of a gun and from nowhere else.

If it is in the king's best interests to rule justly and benevolently over his subjects whom he will treat as his own children, then what stops the king from conflating his own greed or avarice with the best interests of his kingdom and treating his subjects like his livestock. How many peasants were annihilated by machinegun fire as they went over the top of the trenches in WWI for King and Country and how many times were these massacres repeated?  

Even if the first king of the dynasty is a wise and benevolent ruler, what guarantee is there that his descendants would be the same? The answer to this is there is no guarantee and worse, as long as a large enough army supports the king against all other pretenders to the throne, he will stay in power no matter how bad he is. If in the event he is ousted, then what guarantee is there that his successor will be any better? There are none. Which is why this support for an absolute monarch is based on nostalgic fantasies, wishful thinking and an emotional desire for an earthly messianic savior to guide those helpless and hapless peasants to an imaginary utopia.

Finally, the main thing the absolute monarch/Magic King fans miss is that the problem with any previously functional society does not stem from the flaws in the organizational principles of the society but the flaws in all human beings who make up that society. If Man, unconstrained by some power higher than himself even if it's his fellow Man, is given unconstrained, absolute power, then nothing prevents him from being corrupted by or abusing that power. We can place the Magic King in the same category as the new socialist man. Neither model fits within normal human behavior and so both are impossible.

For those who might find this post upsetting, this is not "punching to the right". This Magic King is very much on the political left as it advocates for a strong, authoritarian, top down centrally managed government based around an ideology- rule by divine right usually in Christendom. This makes reactionaries/neo-reactionaries, et al, who claim the mantle of the right, the very model of the political dysphoria of leftists in right wing drag. Words have a definition, concepts based on logic and reason and this includes the definition of the political/economic left and the right. The political spectrum is a straight line with increasing shading of left and right emanating from the center. Any other shape with conventions arbitrarily placed on it is simply nonsense used by post modernists and closeted leftists to hide themselves under whatever side or label they like.

Donald Cavaioli

Happy Fourth of July

 Today is not the day for anything other than celebration so happy 4th everyone!

Be back tomorrow.

The Political Dysphoria of the Trans-Right

 Over the 20th century, Marxists have been successful in establishing themselves as not only the standard bearer of the left, but the very definition of the left itself. Then most other non-Marxist leftists, having accepted the supremacy of Marxism found themselves politically homeless. Many of them being fundamentally post-modernist relied on their tried and true gnostic belief in unknowable truths to redefine themselves as the right. Because after all, in these modern times, the old definition of right and left no longer applies as they argue. There is no right or left as it's now us guys over here on our side of the great debate who think this and those other guys over there who think something else. So if we disagree with the other guys who say they are the left as they understand the term through the personal epiphany of gnosis, then we who disagree with the leftist must be on the right in this exercise. If a group can't define themselves logically and rationally, then that group can fancy themselves to be anything they want but they are really nothing at all. 

And so we have the essence of the trans-right of non-Marxian leftists parading about in right-wing drag. They are easily spotted as they usually spend most of their time bashing conservatives and others on the right and refuse to do anything to really oppose the left other than mildly complain about them. 

And in this, all the trans-right needs to add is using nationalism as a sort of boob job to complete the ensemble. Because, if the Marxian leftist is an internationalist, the those on the right must be nationalist as the right is the opposite of the left.

Further, where the officially recognized leftist is the "I support the current thing" NPC, those who identify as being on the right become a counter-programmed "I'm against the current thing" NPC. Even if there's no such thing as the political left and the right there must be some kind of opposition to those guys over there who think something different from what we think. 

Strictly following either the precepts of a central ideological authority or opposing those who espouse heretical or blasphemous positions for no other reason than it's the views that come from those guys who think different over there is the hallmark of the leftist even if he hates Marx and identifies as a nationalist.

It's all really just pure emoting over words and phrases. Squaring the circle by taking positions based on emotion is exactly what any leftist worth his salt does.

Whereas the leftist current thing is usually based on lies used to promote their agenda, we must still be careful to consider the current thing in context and whether it should be opposed or not based on the facts. Maybe this time the left stumbled onto something that is right because even a broken clock is right twice a day and it would be necessary to deny the left any victory. But not just to deny the left a victory in an issue that is morally and intellectually correct but to expose the left's subterfuge in using the issue to promote their agenda or expand their power. There is more persuasive power in an argument that is true to convince the majority centrist, non-political Joe and Jane Normie to support your cause than a lie hiding the nasty agenda even the normies can see. 

And mostly what the normies need to take a stand, to take action, is to feel that not only are they supporting a position that is justified and true and aligned with their values, but that there are many others out there who also support it. There is strength in numbers.

It's important to for anyone right of center to know who is really on their side and be able to spot and reject the trans-right infiltrator who wears the political right and nationalism like a skin suit to promote their non-Marxian leftist agendas. Just as the Marxian leftists did with liberalism and the Democratic party. Seeing a trend here? More on that in the next post. 

If the right is to have any hope of winning the political and cultural wars, then the non-Marxian leftists, like the left of center moderates and neo-cons must be, disavowed, rejected and expelled from the right. For as they are just as much the enemy as the Marxian leftists.

Donald Cavaioli

The Moral and Intellectual Cowardice of Moderates and Liberals

 In reference to an article posted in PoliticsNY titled-  

At Witts End: Citizen bounty hunters for parking infractions will sew discord

Written by Stephen Witt and posted October 14, 2022

Oh, Stephen, Stephen, to be at your Witt's end you would need to be more than a simple mid-wit which after sampling you columns, mid-wit may be a very generous compliment indeed.

First of all, to call Lincoln Restler an epic smooth brain moron would be grossly unfair and insulting to smooth brained morons everywhere. But surprisingly, to anyone who has the stomach to endure Restler's mind dwarfing verbal diarrhea and stoically endure the cacophony of brain cells screaming in agony as they die, they would be surprised to learn there are many more people more unspeakably vapid and more psychologically demented than Restler- his voters and the hybrid mutations of Transportation Alternatives.

Overall, this article simply highlights the fatuous posturing of moral superiority, of  taking the high road of "being above the fray" in pretending to take no sides all the while being sympathetic to the more radical leftist which illustrates why the moderate and liberal (1960's-70's mainstream variant) has failed. These sorts of weasels want to be seen as the good guys, the non-partisan, as if it would imbue them with some kind of magical intellectual and moral superiority. But in reality, they're sophists of the lowest order, desperate to be liked by both sides in a debate. Never once will a moderate or liberal put his foot down and say "this is right and that is wrong". Instead, this species of worm will answer the question of what do you think? with an "I think what you think but the other guy sorta has a point too". The last part of the other guy sorta has a point too is conditional on if the liberal or moderate thinks no one will so much as look at them with even a small trace of consternation for saying it. 

"In American politics we seem to be moving further to the extremes. Trying to reach the center and compromise is all too often shunned. It’s seen as somehow selling out. In truth, American politics at its best has always been about consensus building to make for the art of the possible."

That is, if the art of the possible is giving leftists only most of what they want for now and the rest of it later as the moderates and liberals that infest this city have proven wont to do over many years. If Rome wasn't built in a day, then this SDA wet dream of a mess made in this city took many years to get to- all with nice, well meaning, liberals and moderates finding this consensus and middle ground which always seemed to lurch slightly left. More important than asking what is possible is asking is this necessary or needed, should we do this and what are the consequences for doing so. And this is the reason why liberalism and moderation has failed in modern politics as they never ask those questions and offer nothing but banal platitudes that makes them useless at best. But when they either go along with the more radical leftist policies or refuse to oppose them with more than tepid objections, they become radical enablers and are worse than useless. Because of this, these are the people who are the most responsible for the asinine progressive leftist policies destroying New York offering only their incessant whining about the growing left-right political divide and all because they'd be mortified to really oppose or stop the Democratic Socialists of America or other leftists lest they be called racists or Trump supporters. In this, liberals and moderates sell out all the time.

"But their [the progressive bike lobby] often heavy-handedness on issues and mob-like tactics on social media can be viewed as a microcosm of what is wrong with American politics today. Too often we get activists and elected leadership from both the right and the left thinking it’s all their way or the highway. The palette is all black and white with no colors in the middle."

They will inevitably damn the right with faint praise and make the mildest criticism against the left for which they will do so either with conditional weasel words or find a flimsy excuse for the damage the left has caused. But still trying to be that "I'm above it all" galaxy brain, Olympian cool poser with a pox on both your houses sneer which is their epic failure at trying to look intelligent and showing some backbone. Sometimes, even many times, there is a real good and bad/right and wrong/smart or stupid idea when we must have the courage to take that black and white response and get some idiot upset. This is where real courage, common sense and intelligence come in and a position in which liberals and moderates are never found.

"While critical, this column is not a put down per se of the progressive bike lobby. They have accomplished many good things for the city. Protected bike lanes and other changes that make streets more equitably utilized are generally very positive improvements."

Then too, the moderate or liberal when ever so gently criticizing the more radical left will offer some apology for that criticism or the sheepish "I kind of agree with the leftist but personally I'm not that radical and wouldn't go with that myself" all the while doing nothing to stop it. For no matter how "not that radical" the liberal and moderate may be, they never find the courage to actually oppose it with more than oleaginous milquetoast words.

In the end this is because, to paraphrase Wittaker Chambers that the liberal thinks the communist is really a rather noble fellow who deserves special consideration in a harsh and reactionary world. Then as the slimy poltroons pretending not to be the co-conspirator of the communists, moderates and liberals are worse than the most woke or SJW twats and so deserve the harshest condemnation and censure.

In regards to the Bike Karen bounty bill that greasy asshole Restler introduced, it died a well deserved death in the city council. Even that collection of leftist dementrons in the city council still had enough functioning cells in those neural junkyards that serve as their head filler to dimly realize just how idiotic that bill was. An accident in our favor for once.

Donald Cavaioli

We're all Americans Except When We're Not.

Our Glorious Managerial Overlords never tire of telling us that from whatever corner of the world one comes from and as soon as they step off the plane or boat or what have you, they are just as American as any person of European Christian descent whose ancestry goes back to the colonial era. Or any similar whose ancestors immigrated and assimilated since. In fact, to disagree with a white progressive liberal on this is blasphemy and punishable as a hate crime. 

And as such the newcomer, whatever his race or religion must be accorded all the respect and hailed as a fellow American especially if he steadfastly refuses to assimilate to the local American culture as soon as his foot touches US soil. The newcomers, as the progressive liberal religion permits, is only an honest-to-goodness, mom, Chevrolet and apple pie American when it's convenient for them and may retain their own ethnicity when it's advantageous. And thus, they demand respect as both at the same time. A cynic would accuse such newcomers of gaming the system to their advantage while thoroughly fucking over their "fellow Americans" and openly laughing at us as they do so. 

But this isn't the fault of the newcomers but the fault of the native born Americans who allow themselves to be taken advantage of. The Joe and Jane Normies who believed all the pretty lies of liberals and allowed themselves to be led around by the nose by SJW and woke oikophobic mutants. The peasants who vote Democrat because "dere for da woikin' guy". Then too, out of fond memories of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, our very own Dark Lord, Darth Decrepit, and stupid enough to believe FDR was their friend. Keep voting Democrat and some day, the Democrats will come back to them but in the mean time, they'll cry and complain about it in the comments section on such local sites as Queenscrap, under anonymous, of course. But come election time, they will crawl off on their bellies and vote back in the same politicians they were bitching about the day before because he's really a great guy and everyone else is an idiot for voting for their corrupt, douchebag politician. It's not their fault, it's the other guy! The punchline is that nobody can ever figure out why things keep getting worse or in the best case, never change. Welcome to Hotel Queens.

Here is a cute little article from Gotham Gazette that illustrates this "I demand to be accepted and respected as an American and I'm still my own ethnicity, demand special privileges and must be respected even more for that" mentality:

Party Primaries in Brooklyn Race for New City Council 'Asian Opportunity District' Come Down to the Wire, June 22, 2023 by Samar Khurshid and Julia Goldberg

So we're all good Americans except when we're not and we must only be represented by our own people as the newcomers, who have formed their own exclusive ethnic colonies and cannot be represented anyone else. Gerrymandering is needed to assure the political integrity of the colony and that the colonists need not have to endure an outsider elected doling out the largess but one of their own to properly loot the public treasury. Not to dunk only on the Asians here, and again, I'm not dunking on any immigrants for playing by our rules, but all the other ethnic colonies are doing it so why not this group as well? If we the people are stupid enough to let them do it, then we deserve to be looted and even worse.

 Of course, for white Americans of the sort who were born and raised here, we must accept having elected politicians of any other race or ethnicity rule over them and like it as second class citizens in their own country. If we don't respect ourselves enough to reject this, silence and send the liberal and other leftist mutants back to the fringes of society where they belong, then we deserve nothing but contempt from the immigrants. Freedom of association and freedom of opinions or choice are strictly forbidden by the woke puritans and we obey and listen to their insipid prattle and lies. This isn't simply hypocrisy, as blatant as it is, but grotesque colonialism and imperialism on such a level that doublethink alone cannot assimilate it, but a full frontal lobotomy followed by enough electroshock treatments to fry whatever neurons one has left is needed.

If we are all Americans, then we are all in playing for the team without hyphens, leaving the old country behind, or not make demands to all to bow to our original ethnicity, accommodate our unique ethnic needs or demands to be only represented by our own race or ethnicity. This is not a betrayal of the old country but acceptance of the new country as befitting a worthy adopted son or daughter. Still, the newcomers will have to work to earn the respect and acceptance of the natives, but anything one works hard for is something one truly wants and will cherish when it is achieved. Something they will proudly pass on to their descendants. For those who can accept this, I would welcome you.

Donald Cavaioli